github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-server (link)

commit signals (1)

source signals (3)

• .github/workflows/claude-code-review.ymlvia claude-code

  name: Claude Code Review
  
  #
  #  The workflow uses `pull_request_target` rather than `pull_request`.  GitHub
  #  never grants the `id-token` permission to a fork's `pull_request` run, so the
  #  Anthropic authentication failed on every pull request from a fork.  The
  #  target event runs in the base repository's context with real permissions.
  #  The checkout below stays on the base branch, and the review reads the
  #  pull request through the GitHub application programming interface (API).
  #  No code from the for

• .github/workflows/claude.ymlvia claude-code

  name: Claude Code
  
  on:
    issue_comment:
      types: [created]
    pull_request_review_comment:
      types: [created]
    issues:
      types: [opened, assigned]
    pull_request_review:
      types: [submitted]
  
  jobs:
    claude:
      #
      #  The condition restricts the job to trusted contributors. The
      #  Claude Code action needs `id-token: write`. GitHub denies
      #  `id-token: write` for events originating on fork pull requests,
      #  regardless of what we put in the `permissions:` block. Without the
      #  condi

• AGENTS.mdvia agents-md

  # Policy on AI Agents
  
  > [!IMPORTANT]
  > This project does **not** accept pull requests that are fully or
  > predominantly AI-generated. AI tools may be utilized solely to
  > assist individual development.
  >
  > If we receive an AI PR that _clearly has had zero testing_, then we
  > will **ban the person who submitted the PR**.
  >
  > Submitting a garbage PR isn't just AI slop, it's abuse.
  
  AI assistance is fine.  But when someone submits a PR, we assume that
  they understand the submission, and that they accept full
  

ignorefile signals (1)